May 28 2008

Profile Image of Jonathan
Jonathan

Please Consider the Environment

Posted at 3:27 pm under Opinion

I’ve noticed this email signature showing up in more and more emails lately:

Please consider the environment before printing this email

Why not print the email if I want/need to?  My take on this whole idea is that trees are a renewable resource.  I have a small inclination to print each email that sports that tagline and send it via USPS to the sender.  The only problem with that is it costs nearly $.50 to send anything in the mail these days.

Now, don’t get me (too) wrong.  I’m not for throwing trash out the window of the car unless there’s a prison crew cleaning up trash on the side of the road.  (Hey, they need to be kept busy – my tax dollars are paying for their A/C and cable TV)  In other words, pollution isn’t cool.  But at the same time, I’m not going to put anybody down for driving a gas-guzzling pickup truck or SUV.  If that’s what they want, and they can afford the gas, I’ll cheer them on.

Anyway, I’m getting a little off the subject.  This signature has come from people that seem to me to be the know-it-all, or holier-than-thou type.  That is, in the emails I’ve personally received that include the signature.  To me it’s ridiculous.  Again, trees are a renewable resource.  They’re always going to be around.  I haven’t researched this out myself, but some say that if we don’t use paper, there aren’t as many trees because when trees are cut down for paper, more are planted in their place.  Maybe they’re planted more densely?  I’m not sure.  I do know, however, that new trees are growing all the time.  In fact, I have 5 or 6 growing in my back yard right now.  So there – I’m allowed to print emails now.

4 responses so far

4 Responses to “Please Consider the Environment”

  1. Sheron 20 Jun 2008 at 5:32 pm 1

    Jonathan – If I were you, I would research the subject before posting a comment that you have not taken the time to educate yourself on.

  2. Jonathanon 21 Jun 2008 at 8:10 am 2

    Which comment might that be? That if we don’t use them, they’ll go away? I did admit that I hadn’t researched it out, and I did not state it as fact.

    I honestly don’t have any inclination to research it, because I don’t have the time for one, and secondly I still stand on the fact that more can be (and are) planted in their place.

    However, if you’d like to take a little time to educate me since you do imply that you know something of the subject, I’d be interested to read it.

  3. Bradon 01 Jul 2008 at 12:28 pm 3

    looks like you scared her off. score.

  4. Jonathanon 01 Jul 2008 at 12:30 pm 4

    Yeah, except the idea is to keep people coming back. :)

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Please note: Use of a non-personal web site or blog in the field above and/or comments that are off-topic, personal attacks, or ones including profanity will likely be removed at my discretion. By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.